Read Part One: The Psychology (HERE).
One of the number one arguments I get from Christian men fighting for patriarchy and fighting against feminism is this: “We are not trying to be like the world; as Christians we are to be countercultural.” This comment makes me want to spit out my latte, fall to the floor, and laugh hysterically. Of course, that would be unladylike, so I will refrain and stick to “academic-sounding” arguments.
Fellows (and ladies), patriarchy is not countercultural.
Sure, if we interpret the Bible through the context of American Celebrity in 2015, then maybe you have a case, but wake up. Look around the globe. Read the New York Times. Open a history book. Heck, read the Bible. Patriarchy has always been what the “cool kids” were doing and, generally speaking, still is worldwide.
Feminism (simply the full equality of the sexes) is what is actually countercultural and unpopular.
Maybe Beyonce, Katy Perry, and Hillary Clinton have made us think otherwise, but have we forgotten that American celebritism is not the center of the universe?
Women are still being stoned to death for committing adultery in Afghanistan (Source Here). “Islamic State thugs are giving away abducted girls as prizes in game show-style Koranic verse reading competitions, the Daily Mirror can reveal. The twisted memory test involves jihadis reciting verse in public and the one who is judged the winner is given a kidnapped girl as a prize (Source Here).”
Yet, here in America and probably other first-world nations, we have goodhearted church women claiming that women are to be “helpmeets” to their husbands, with little to no understanding of the true interpretation of the Hebrew word “Ezer” (helper) found in Genesis 2:18.
Often these church women take no issue with their subordinate role because they are married to decent men who don’t abuse their power. They are living in the ideal state of their “biblical womanhood” illusion and take no time to consider how their doctrine could be affecting the rest of the universe.
When we don’t understand that the word “Ezer” is used to describe “God as our Helper” in the Old Testament, we miss the power of this word, diminish the female race, and give a “biblical” stamp of approval to patriarchy of all sorts – everything from “nice” complementarianism to “not so nice” radical members of ISIS.
Marg Mowczko writes,
The word ezer is used twenty-one times in the Old Testament. Twice it is used in the context of the first woman. Three times it is used of people helping (or failing to help) in life-threatening situations. Sixteen times it is used in reference to God as a helper. Without exception, these biblical texts are talking about a vital, powerful kind of help. Yet when ezer is applied to the first woman, its meaning is usually diminished to fit with traditional and cultural views of women’s roles (Source Here).
Secondly, Genesis 1:27 states,
God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them (NASB).
Women are full image-bearers of God.
It is illogical to claim that women are of less authority than men when woman was made in the full image of God. Adam and Eve were equals. Eve was Adam’s “helper” in the sense of companionship. There is no mention of male hierarchy in the Garden of Eden until after Adam and Eve ate of the forbidden fruit.
Patriarchy was Eve’s consequence for disobeying God.
To the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth, In pain you will bring forth children; Yet your desire will be for your husband, And he will rule over you (Genesis 3:16 NASB).”
So, why was Adam held accountable first when Eve disobeyed God first?
Then the Lord God called to the man, and said to him, “Where are you (Genesis 3:9)?”
Well, Adam was actually not held accountable first.
He was “called out” first to explain what had happened, but when God gets the full story from Adam, God first hands out consequences to the Serpent (Satan), then to Eve, and then to Adam (Genesis 3:14-19). Woman and man were held equally responsible for the fall of humankind.
The Bible does not directly say why God got the scoop from Adam first, but we can suggest a few reasons. Perhaps it was because Adam was created before Eve. Perhaps it was because Adam had been directly warned by God not to eat of the forbidden tree, and Eve was told by Adam as second-hand information. Who knows? We were not there and the Bible does not tell us God’s reasoning.
Nevertheless, to use Genesis 3:9 to limit the leadership of women universally and timelessly is ridiculous, because the Bible names many female leaders in both the Old and New Testaments.
Since the fall of humankind, men have been ruling over women. It always goes south. Sometimes it starts out as “nice” as the enemy of our souls fights to keep us all under the curse of patriarchy. Satan knows the power of “ezer” and greatly fears women who wake up and realize who they were created to be – “equal helpers” who were made to lead as God leads, love how God loves, and change the world as God changes the world.
Look out for Part 3: “The Anthropology.”
Help Jory Micah Break the Glass Steeple by Following Her Blog by Inserting Your Email to the Right or Below.